 |
 |
 |
Quiet Mountain Essays
|
|
Copyright ©, 2005
|
|
|
The Postmodern Challenge by Chipo Hungwe
|
|
Introduction In contemporary sociological theory the term postmodernism has lacked a clear definition because of controversies surrounding it. While some define it as a new era to come, others argue that we are already living in it. Yet, still others argue that there is nothing new but an extension of modernism, so it is therefore high modernity. Ritzer (1996:470) claims that postmodernism is “the hottest game in town”, and that it has been abused by both its supporters and detractors in the course of the debate between them. Scott (1997:277) views the postmodernism worldview as a product of a search for alternatives. Seguin (1994), however, introduces the subject of postmodernism as generally confronted by two responses. The first denies the very existence of the concept and, initially, refuses to engage in debate. The second response views postmodernism as a weapon devised by capitalism to solve the dilemmas undermining it since the oil crisis.
This paper adopts a definition by Taylor & Winquist (1998) who state that postmodernism is: a strategy of refinement of a certain intellectual movement, a post-Marxist libertarian movement; an artistic style which emerged in the 1960s; a new ideology of global capitalism; the most recent movement of criticisms; a protofascist ideology; and a mutation of the western societies. Taylor & Winquist (1998) further note that in literary criticism the term postmodernism was used by Irving Howe and Harry Levin to lament on the leveling off of the modernist movement in the 1960s. They were looking back nostalgically at what seemed like a rich past. It was only in the 1970s that the term gained momentum encompassing first architecture, then dance, theatre, painting, film and music.
|
|
Advantages of Postmodernism
1. It is a liberating movement - by championing the cause of the oppressed, postmodernism offers a breath of fresh air. The oppressed are not those of the modern era, such as the working class, but a medley of interest groups, communities and identities that include at a minimum, women, racial groups, gays and lesbians, ethnic minorities and various expressions of non-western sentiments (Kellner 1992). These groups are offered an opportunity to create reality from their own perspective, questioning the grand narratives, the norm pertaining to issues of class domination, religion, gender oppression, etc.
2. By championing the cause of the poor, postmodernism offers an end of the western dominated history. The end of history is seen as a liberating experience, for it frees those trapped for years within the walls of a Eurocentric discourse. Now, history has to be redefined from below, or from any perspective and angle, because there is no longer one history but multiple histories. There is a refusal to continue with a universe crafted by the minds of the “dead white males” (Lee 1994). The bottom up approach in rural development aims to define reality and write the text from another angle. This implies role reversals wherein the third world produces knowledge from its own perspective, and also the researcher is no longer the only 'knower' because the informants know more about themselves than the researcher. However, the extent to which local knowledge replaces western universalistic concepts still depends on the strength of local political alliances with the west. In other words, while there are efforts to indigenize knowledge, these processes are not independent of the global influences of the western powers. If one is to take the example of structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) introduced by African countries, many have been acclaimed to be home grown, but we know that the one who gives you money also gives you ideas on how to spend it. That is why those who have not used their monies properly, or have not followed prescribed procedure for creating certain conditions (for example: good governance, democracy etc.), have faced the wrath of Bretton Woods institutions and, ultimately, have had their supplies cut until they are in compliance with the set procedures.
3. Cultural reinvention - this suggests that traditional life worlds are constantly activated through globalization to produce and reproduce images of otherness. This activation of the traditional life worlds may result in managed pluralism or unrestricted outbursts of nationalist sentiments. In the first place, managed pluralism refers to an endorsement of multiculturalism that allows for the continuous reproduction of ethnic identities without severely compromising the goals of modernization. Cultural reinvention ultimately dramatizes the differences of the western and non- western. An example could be the choreography of our Zimbabwean local dances that are far from the “original” but are meant to magnify the differences between Zimbabweans and “others”. For instance, Thomas Mapfumo’s mbira music differs from American music but, at the same time, his music is a shift from the ‘original’ mbira music as Zimbabweans know it. Thus the resultant music is neither American nor Zimbabwean but a fusion, hybrid, pastiche of the past and present.
4. Mass tourism and traditionalism - Mass tourism that is a result of globalized leisure capitalism is a vital stimulant of traditionalism. It not only provides an economic incentive for multiculturalism but also a social or political reason for rejecting a mono-cultural model of modernization. The community based resource management programmes are such examples, as they are connected to consumer markets and mass tourism, as well as traditionalism, but do not question regimes in power.
|
|
Critique of Postmodernism
1. Multiculturalism is problematic - De Sausa Santos (1996) argues that the domination of modern science as knowledge, and as regulation, brought about a destruction of many forms of knowledge, particularly those that were peculiar to people subjected to western colonialism. Such destruction provoked silences, and rendered unpronounceable the needs and aspirations of the people or social groups whose forms of knowledge were subjected to destruction. The question therefore is: how then is it possible to engage in a multicultural dialogue where some cultures were reduced to silence, and their forms of seeing and believing the world have become unpronounceable? In other words, how is it possible to make silence speak without having it necessarily speak the language of a multicultural dialogue? The argument therefore is that multiculturalism is a ploy, a ruse meant to trick “the other’ into believing that they are on the same footing with the western (De Sausa Santos 1996: 37).
2. Postmodernism is another Eurocentric metanarrative. By discarding the old metanarratives postmodernists are creating yet another one. Postmodernism emerged from the west, against modernity. Its major concern of destroying grand narratives such as religion, tradition and history, is rather detrimental to the very existence of the non-west, because it is those very narratives that make the non-west different from the west. In other words, by creating a secular world, postmodernists are bringing in a new metanarrative that has no echo in the non-west. The very insistence that everything is meaningless is a western notion that has no support among African civilizations (Sardar 1996, Smart 1993). As if that was not enough, the postmodernist obsession with irony, ridicule and cynicism becomes a sword that finally writes off the non-west by further marginalising them.
3. Postmodernism does not address issues of power because it does not question structures of power, but rather creates false ideas that the west now respects the non-western through globalization etc. The process, therefore, of inclusion in the multicultural dialogue is a process of exclusion, since it is impossible for Zimbabweans, for example, to instruct non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on what to do without risking the flight of these western agents. Thus, the rules are still the same but expressed differently. Is participation useful in rural development when the evaluators have their own evaluation plans even before the project is implemented? What is postmodern about poverty?
|
|
Conclusion
Postmodernism has been useful in as far as pointing out that women are not a homogeneous group but rather belong to diverse socio-economic groups based on race, ethnic and class identities. Therefore, to the extent that postmodernism offers a critique of modernization, and shows the contribution of other non-west societies, postmodernism offers a pervasive questioning of modern institutions, practices, and forms of rationality. However, it is rendered a loud sounding nothing by its inability to question political power structures. It only states that we are different, which is nothing new since everyone knew that before. In terms of rural development, there is no 'multi-vocalization', so the equal participation of the hitherto suppressed is a myth.
|
|
Bibliography
De Sausa Santos, B. 1996 “On Oppositional Postmodernism” in R. Munck & D. O’hearn (eds) Critical Development Theory; London: Routledge.
Kellner, D. 1992 “Popular Culture and the Construction of Postmodern Identities” in S. Lash and J. Friedman (eds) Modernity and Identity; Oxford: Blackwell.
Lee, R. L M. 1994 “Modernisation, Postmodernism and the Third World” in R. Brym (ed) Current Sociology; Vol 42#2.
Ritzer, G. 1996 Modern Sociological Theory; New York: Macmillan.
Sardar, Z. 1996 “Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism”in R. Munck and D. O’Hearn (eds) Critical Development Theory; London: Routledge.
Scott, A. (ed) 1997 The Limits of Globalisation: Cases and Arguments; London: Routledge.
Sequin, E. 1994 “A Modest Reason ” in Theory Culture and Society; Vol 2 #3.
Smart, B. 1993 Postmodernity; London: Routledge.
Taylor, V. E. & Winquist, C. E. (eds) 1998 Postmodernism: Critical Concepts; London: Routledge.
|
|
Contributor's Notes..
|
|
Ms. Hungwe is a lecturer in the Department of Human Resource Management at the Midlands State University in Gweru, Zimbabwe. She is a sociologist by training and has a Masters degree in Sociology and Social Anthropology; and is currently working towards a PhD in aging. A frequent contributor to QME, Ms. Hungwe has written on aging and gender, as well as food security and gender, for this journal.
|
|
 |
|
QME Home Top of Page Archives Home
|
Some Tenets of Postmodernism
Deconstruction - the most visible feature of deconstruction is its focus upon languages, literary
discourse and meaning of texts. Derrida (1976:158 in Smart 1993) argues, “There is nothing outside
of the text”. Postmodernism questions received wisdom, and consciously seeks and creates
juxtapositions, appropriating from one source to be used in another anything that helps to show and
contest the constructed character of social reality. The ultimate aim is to question objective truth,
since it is viewed as an artificially imposed restriction on the total supremacy of the inventive mind,
while reality is considered a fleeting by-production of fiction. There is what Lyotad refers to as
“incredulity towards narratives”.
Avantgardism - generally refers to the unorthodox. It refers to a shift from production to consumption
(authorship to reception- seriousness to play).